Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CWGFX vs LGCRX
CWGFX vs LGCRX Comparison
Open Charts CWGFX vs LGCRX
CWGFX vs LGCRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CWGFX vs. LGCRX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CWGFX is a Buy and LGCRX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CWGFX has more cash in the bank: 158B vs. LGCRX (388M). CWGFX pays higher dividends than LGCRX: CWGFX (1.29) vs LGCRX (0.26). CWGFX was incepted earlier than LGCRX: CWGFX (26 years) vs LGCRX (10 years). LGCRX (1.29) is less costly to investors than CWGFX (0.79). LGCRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 61.00 vs. CWGFX (44.00). LGCRX has a lower initial minimum investment than CWGFX: LGCRX (0) vs CWGFX (250). CWGFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.47 vs. LGCRX (10.43). LGCRX return over 5 years is better than : 36.91 vs. CWGFX (32.66).
| CWGFX | LGCRX | CWGFX / LGCRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.79 | 1.15 | 69% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.79 | 1.29 | 61% |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.977 | 9.273 | 172% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 158B | 388M | 40,722% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.29 | 0.26 | 491% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.47 | 10.43 | 110% |
| Returns for 3 years | 51.55 | 69.63 | 74% |
| Returns for 5 years | 32.66 | 36.91 | 88% |
| Returns for 10 years | 97.07 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement