Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CWGFX vs LGCSX
CWGFX vs LGCSX Comparison
Open Charts CWGFX vs LGCSX
CWGFX vs LGCSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CWGFX vs. LGCSX commentary
Aug 03, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CWGFX is a Buy and LGCSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CWGFX has more cash in the bank: 158B vs. LGCSX (397M). CWGFX pays higher dividends than LGCSX: CWGFX (1.31) vs LGCSX (0.46). CWGFX was incepted earlier than LGCSX: CWGFX (25 years) vs LGCSX (10 years). LGCSX (1.04) is less costly to investors than CWGFX (0.79). LGCSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 61.00 vs. CWGFX (44.00). LGCSX has a lower initial minimum investment than CWGFX: LGCSX (0) vs CWGFX (250). CWGFX (15.55) and LGCSX (15.19) have marching annual gain over last year. LGCSX return over 5 years is better than : 38.59 vs. CWGFX (32.96).
| CWGFX | LGCSX | CWGFX / LGCSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.79 | 0.90 | 88% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.79 | 1.04 | 76% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.986 | 8.099 | 173% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 158B | 397M | 39,798% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.31 | 0.46 | 285% |
| Returns for 1 year | 15.55 | 15.19 | 102% |
| Returns for 3 years | 43.96 | 62.88 | 70% |
| Returns for 5 years | 32.96 | 38.59 | 85% |
| Returns for 10 years | 93.69 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers