Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CWGFX vs LGCSX
CWGFX vs LGCSX Comparison
Open Charts CWGFX vs LGCSX
CWGFX vs LGCSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CWGFX vs. LGCSX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CWGFX is a Hold and LGCSX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CWGFX has more cash in the bank: 160B vs. LGCSX (399M). CWGFX pays higher dividends than LGCSX: CWGFX (1.30) vs LGCSX (0.46). CWGFX was incepted earlier than LGCSX: CWGFX (25 years) vs LGCSX (9 years). LGCSX (1.04) is less costly to investors than CWGFX (0.79). LGCSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 61.00 vs. CWGFX (44.00). LGCSX has a lower initial minimum investment than CWGFX: LGCSX (0) vs CWGFX (250). CWGFX (21.82) and LGCSX (21.45) have marching annual gain over last year. LGCSX return over 5 years is better than : 40.41 vs. CWGFX (35.16).
| CWGFX | LGCSX | CWGFX / LGCSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.79 | 0.90 | 88% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.79 | 1.04 | 76% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.610 | 8.840 | 177% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 160B | 399M | 40,100% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.30 | 0.46 | 284% |
| Returns for 1 year | 21.82 | 21.45 | 102% |
| Returns for 3 years | 53.10 | 73.47 | 72% |
| Returns for 5 years | 35.16 | 40.41 | 87% |
| Returns for 10 years | 109.39 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement