Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CWGFX vs LGCSX
CWGFX vs LGCSX Comparison
Open Charts CWGFX vs LGCSX
CWGFX vs LGCSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CWGFX vs. LGCSX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CWGFX is a Buy and LGCSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CWGFX has more cash in the bank: 158B vs. LGCSX (388M). CWGFX pays higher dividends than LGCSX: CWGFX (1.29) vs LGCSX (0.45). CWGFX was incepted earlier than LGCSX: CWGFX (26 years) vs LGCSX (10 years). LGCSX (1.04) is less costly to investors than CWGFX (0.79). LGCSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 61.00 vs. CWGFX (44.00). LGCSX has a lower initial minimum investment than CWGFX: LGCSX (0) vs CWGFX (250). CWGFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.47 vs. LGCSX (10.75). LGCSX return over 5 years is better than : 38.12 vs. CWGFX (32.66).
| CWGFX | LGCSX | CWGFX / LGCSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.79 | 0.90 | 88% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.79 | 1.04 | 76% |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.977 | 9.481 | 169% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 158B | 388M | 40,722% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.29 | 0.45 | 287% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.47 | 10.75 | 107% |
| Returns for 3 years | 51.55 | 70.89 | 73% |
| Returns for 5 years | 32.66 | 38.12 | 86% |
| Returns for 10 years | 97.07 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement