Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CWGFX vs LGCVX
CWGFX vs LGCVX Comparison
Open Charts CWGFX vs LGCVX
CWGFX vs LGCVX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CWGFX vs. LGCVX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CWGFX is a Hold and LGCVX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CWGFX has more cash in the bank: 160B vs. LGCVX (398M). CWGFX pays higher dividends than LGCVX: CWGFX (1.30) vs LGCVX (0.66). CWGFX was incepted earlier than LGCVX: CWGFX (25 years) vs LGCVX (9 years). CWGFX (0.79) and LGCVX (0.79) have similar cost to investors . LGCVX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 61.00 vs. CWGFX (44.00). LGCVX has a lower initial minimum investment than CWGFX: LGCVX (0) vs CWGFX (250). LGCVX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 21.70 vs. CWGFX (18.82). LGCVX return over 5 years is better than : 41.97 vs. CWGFX (31.85).
| CWGFX | LGCVX | CWGFX / LGCVX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.79 | 0.65 | 122% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.79 | 0.79 | 100% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.406 | 8.937 | 150% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 160B | 398M | 40,201% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.30 | 0.66 | 197% |
| Returns for 1 year | 18.82 | 21.70 | 87% |
| Returns for 3 years | 50.18 | 74.76 | 67% |
| Returns for 5 years | 31.85 | 41.97 | 76% |
| Returns for 10 years | 105.40 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement