Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CWGFX vs LGCWX
CWGFX vs LGCWX Comparison
Open Charts CWGFX vs LGCWX
CWGFX vs LGCWX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CWGFX vs. LGCWX commentary
Jun 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CWGFX is a Buy and LGCWX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CWGFX has more cash in the bank: 152B vs. LGCWX (400M). CWGFX pays higher dividends than LGCWX: CWGFX (1.30) vs LGCWX (0.65). CWGFX was incepted earlier than LGCWX: CWGFX (25 years) vs LGCWX (9 years). CWGFX (0.79) is less costly to investors than LGCWX (0.70). LGCWX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 61.00 vs. CWGFX (44.00). LGCWX has a lower initial minimum investment than CWGFX: LGCWX (0) vs CWGFX (250). CWGFX (22.43) and LGCWX (22.25) have marching annual gain over last year. LGCWX return over 5 years is better than : 43.59 vs. CWGFX (35.31).
| CWGFX | LGCWX | CWGFX / LGCWX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.79 | 0.56 | 141% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.79 | 0.70 | 113% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.636 | 9.896 | 158% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 152B | 400M | 38,000% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.30 | 0.65 | 198% |
| Returns for 1 year | 22.43 | 22.25 | 101% |
| Returns for 3 years | 54.53 | 78.79 | 69% |
| Returns for 5 years | 35.31 | 43.59 | 81% |
| Returns for 10 years | 99.29 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers