Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CWGFX vs MCGCX
CWGFX vs MCGCX Comparison
Open Charts CWGFX vs MCGCX
CWGFX vs MCGCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CWGFX vs. MCGCX commentary
Sep 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CWGFX is a Buy and MCGCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CWGFX has more cash in the bank: 158B vs. MCGCX (627M). CWGFX pays higher dividends than MCGCX: CWGFX (1.29) vs MCGCX (0.93). CWGFX was incepted earlier than MCGCX: CWGFX (26 years) vs MCGCX (32 years). MCGCX (2.06) is less costly to investors than CWGFX (0.79). MCGCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 160.00 vs. CWGFX (44.00). CWGFX has a lower initial minimum investment than MCGCX: CWGFX (250) vs MCGCX (1000). MCGCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.72 vs. CWGFX (11.47). CWGFX return over 5 years is better than : 32.66 vs. MCGCX (30.34).
| CWGFX | MCGCX | CWGFX / MCGCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.79 | 1.71 | 46% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.79 | 2.06 | 38% |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 32 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.977 | 18.809 | 85% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 158B | 627M | 25,199% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.29 | 0.93 | 139% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.47 | 12.72 | 90% |
| Returns for 3 years | 51.55 | 41.30 | 125% |
| Returns for 5 years | 32.66 | 30.34 | 108% |
| Returns for 10 years | 97.07 | 34.00 | 285% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement