Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CWGFX vs MCGCX
CWGFX vs MCGCX Comparison
Open Charts CWGFX vs MCGCX
CWGFX vs MCGCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CWGFX vs. MCGCX commentary
Jun 20, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CWGFX is a Hold and MCGCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CWGFX has more cash in the bank: 160B vs. MCGCX (624M). CWGFX pays higher dividends than MCGCX: CWGFX (1.30) vs MCGCX (0.94). CWGFX was incepted earlier than MCGCX: CWGFX (25 years) vs MCGCX (32 years). MCGCX (2.06) is less costly to investors than CWGFX (0.79). MCGCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 160.00 vs. CWGFX (44.00). CWGFX has a lower initial minimum investment than MCGCX: CWGFX (250) vs MCGCX (1000). MCGCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 23.79 vs. CWGFX (21.38). CWGFX return over 5 years is better than : 36.79 vs. MCGCX (14.87).
| CWGFX | MCGCX | CWGFX / MCGCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.79 | 1.71 | 46% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.79 | 2.06 | 38% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 32 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.681 | 17.609 | 89% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 160B | 624M | 25,641% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.30 | 0.94 | 139% |
| Returns for 1 year | 21.38 | 23.79 | 90% |
| Returns for 3 years | 44.61 | 36.91 | 121% |
| Returns for 5 years | 36.79 | 14.87 | 247% |
| Returns for 10 years | 101.79 | 36.29 | 280% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers