Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CWGFX vs MDGCX
CWGFX vs MDGCX Comparison
Open Charts CWGFX vs MDGCX
CWGFX vs MDGCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CWGFX vs. MDGCX commentary
Jun 18, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CWGFX is a Hold and MDGCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CWGFX has more cash in the bank: 160B vs. MDGCX (624M). CWGFX pays higher dividends than MDGCX: CWGFX (1.30) vs MDGCX (1.04). CWGFX was incepted earlier than MDGCX: CWGFX (25 years) vs MDGCX (32 years). MDGCX (1.20) is less costly to investors than CWGFX (0.79). MDGCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 160.00 vs. CWGFX (44.00). CWGFX has a lower initial minimum investment than MDGCX: CWGFX (250) vs MDGCX (1000). MDGCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 28.38 vs. CWGFX (21.14). CWGFX return over 5 years is better than : 36.42 vs. MDGCX (31.85).
| CWGFX | MDGCX | CWGFX / MDGCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.79 | 0.96 | 82% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.79 | 1.20 | 66% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 32 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.370 | 18.070 | 85% |
| Front Load | N/A | 5% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 160B | 624M | 25,641% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.30 | 1.04 | 124% |
| Returns for 1 year | 21.14 | 28.38 | 74% |
| Returns for 3 years | 49.47 | 52.30 | 95% |
| Returns for 5 years | 36.42 | 31.85 | 114% |
| Returns for 10 years | 104.81 | 74.61 | 140% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement