Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CWGFX vs MGISX
CWGFX vs MGISX Comparison
Open Charts CWGFX vs MGISX
CWGFX vs MGISX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CWGFX vs. MGISX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CWGFX is a Hold and MGISX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CWGFX has more cash in the bank: 160B vs. MGISX (1.14B). CWGFX pays higher dividends than MGISX: CWGFX (1.30) vs MGISX (0.68). CWGFX was incepted earlier than MGISX: CWGFX (25 years) vs MGISX (11 years). MGISX (0.84) is less costly to investors than CWGFX (0.79). CWGFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. MGISX (35.00). CWGFX has a lower initial minimum investment than MGISX: CWGFX (250) vs MGISX (5000000). CWGFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.82 vs. MGISX (-24.07). CWGFX return over 5 years is better than : 31.85 vs. MGISX (-19.26).
| CWGFX | MGISX | CWGFX / MGISX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.79 | 0.84 | 94% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.79 | 0.84 | 94% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.406 | -11.130 | -120% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 5000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 160B | 1.14B | 14,085% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.30 | 0.68 | 191% |
| Returns for 1 year | 18.82 | -24.07 | -78% |
| Returns for 3 years | 50.18 | -18.34 | -274% |
| Returns for 5 years | 31.85 | -19.26 | -165% |
| Returns for 10 years | 105.40 | 33.61 | 314% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement