Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CWGFX vs MKGCX
CWGFX vs MKGCX Comparison
Open Charts CWGFX vs MKGCX
CWGFX vs MKGCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CWGFX vs. MKGCX commentary
Jun 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CWGFX is a Buy and MKGCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CWGFX has more cash in the bank: 152B vs. MKGCX (629M). CWGFX pays higher dividends than MKGCX: CWGFX (1.30) vs MKGCX (1.18). CWGFX was incepted earlier than MKGCX: CWGFX (25 years) vs MKGCX (8 years). MKGCX (0.82) and CWGFX (0.79) have similar cost to investors . MKGCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 160.00 vs. CWGFX (44.00). CWGFX has a lower initial minimum investment than MKGCX: CWGFX (250) vs MKGCX (5000000). MKGCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 31.68 vs. CWGFX (22.43). MKGCX return over 5 years is better than : 37.43 vs. CWGFX (35.31).
| CWGFX | MKGCX | CWGFX / MKGCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.79 | 0.66 | 120% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.79 | 0.82 | 96% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.636 | 19.954 | 78% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 5000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 152B | 629M | 24,165% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.30 | 1.18 | 110% |
| Returns for 1 year | 22.43 | 31.68 | 71% |
| Returns for 3 years | 54.53 | 63.68 | 86% |
| Returns for 5 years | 35.31 | 37.43 | 94% |
| Returns for 10 years | 99.29 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers