Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CWGFX vs MKGCX
CWGFX vs MKGCX Comparison
Open Charts CWGFX vs MKGCX
CWGFX vs MKGCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CWGFX vs. MKGCX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CWGFX is a Buy and MKGCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CWGFX has more cash in the bank: 158B vs. MKGCX (627M). CWGFX pays higher dividends than MKGCX: CWGFX (1.29) vs MKGCX (1.16). CWGFX was incepted earlier than MKGCX: CWGFX (26 years) vs MKGCX (9 years). MKGCX (0.82) and CWGFX (0.79) have similar cost to investors . MKGCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 160.00 vs. CWGFX (44.00). CWGFX has a lower initial minimum investment than MKGCX: CWGFX (250) vs MKGCX (5000000). MKGCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.75 vs. CWGFX (11.47). MKGCX return over 5 years is better than : 49.91 vs. CWGFX (32.66).
| CWGFX | MKGCX | CWGFX / MKGCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.79 | 0.66 | 120% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.79 | 0.82 | 96% |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.977 | 19.688 | 81% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 5000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 158B | 627M | 25,199% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.29 | 1.16 | 111% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.47 | 17.75 | 65% |
| Returns for 3 years | 51.55 | 58.03 | 89% |
| Returns for 5 years | 32.66 | 49.91 | 65% |
| Returns for 10 years | 97.07 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement