Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CWGFX vs MSFAX
CWGFX vs MSFAX Comparison
Open Charts CWGFX vs MSFAX
CWGFX vs MSFAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CWGFX vs. MSFAX commentary
Jul 07, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CWGFX is a Buy and MSFAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CWGFX has more cash in the bank: 160B vs. MSFAX (1.04B). CWGFX pays higher dividends than MSFAX: CWGFX (1.30) vs MSFAX (0.52). CWGFX was incepted earlier than MSFAX: CWGFX (25 years) vs MSFAX (25 years). MSFAX (0.96) is less costly to investors than CWGFX (0.79). CWGFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. MSFAX (35.00). CWGFX has a lower initial minimum investment than MSFAX: CWGFX (250) vs MSFAX (1000000). CWGFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.08 vs. MSFAX (-24.63). CWGFX return over 5 years is better than : 34.05 vs. MSFAX (-19.64).
| CWGFX | MSFAX | CWGFX / MSFAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.79 | 0.96 | 82% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.79 | 0.96 | 82% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.327 | -8.331 | -184% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 160B | 1.04B | 15,444% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.30 | 0.52 | 252% |
| Returns for 1 year | 16.08 | -24.63 | -65% |
| Returns for 3 years | 52.21 | -16.06 | -325% |
| Returns for 5 years | 34.05 | -19.64 | -173% |
| Returns for 10 years | 101.17 | 30.40 | 333% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers