Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CWGFX vs MSFAX
CWGFX vs MSFAX Comparison
Open Charts CWGFX vs MSFAX
CWGFX vs MSFAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CWGFX vs. MSFAX commentary
Jun 11, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CWGFX is a Buy and MSFAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CWGFX has more cash in the bank: 160B vs. MSFAX (1.22B). CWGFX pays higher dividends than MSFAX: CWGFX (1.30) vs MSFAX (0.50). CWGFX was incepted earlier than MSFAX: CWGFX (25 years) vs MSFAX (25 years). MSFAX (0.96) is less costly to investors than CWGFX (0.79). CWGFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. MSFAX (35.00). CWGFX has a lower initial minimum investment than MSFAX: CWGFX (250) vs MSFAX (1000000). CWGFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.00 vs. MSFAX (-24.78). CWGFX return over 5 years is better than : 27.88 vs. MSFAX (-17.76).
| CWGFX | MSFAX | CWGFX / MSFAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.79 | 0.96 | 82% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.79 | 0.96 | 82% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.165 | -9.578 | -106% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 160B | 1.22B | 13,147% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.30 | 0.50 | 257% |
| Returns for 1 year | 15.00 | -24.78 | -61% |
| Returns for 3 years | 46.65 | -15.51 | -301% |
| Returns for 5 years | 27.88 | -17.76 | -157% |
| Returns for 10 years | 91.99 | 31.59 | 291% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers