Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CWGFX vs MSFAX
CWGFX vs MSFAX Comparison
Open Charts CWGFX vs MSFAX
CWGFX vs MSFAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CWGFX vs. MSFAX commentary
Aug 26, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CWGFX is a StrongBuy and MSFAX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CWGFX has more cash in the bank: 156B vs. MSFAX (977M). CWGFX pays higher dividends than MSFAX: CWGFX (1.31) vs MSFAX (0.49). CWGFX was incepted earlier than MSFAX: CWGFX (25 years) vs MSFAX (25 years). MSFAX (0.96) is less costly to investors than CWGFX (0.79). CWGFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. MSFAX (35.00). CWGFX has a lower initial minimum investment than MSFAX: CWGFX (250) vs MSFAX (1000000). CWGFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.19 vs. MSFAX (-17.97). CWGFX return over 5 years is better than : 35.62 vs. MSFAX (-14.74).
| CWGFX | MSFAX | CWGFX / MSFAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.79 | 0.96 | 82% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.79 | 0.96 | 82% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 17.150 | -2.293 | -748% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 156B | 977M | 15,967% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.31 | 0.49 | 267% |
| Returns for 1 year | 16.19 | -17.97 | -90% |
| Returns for 3 years | 54.75 | -11.65 | -470% |
| Returns for 5 years | 35.62 | -14.74 | -242% |
| Returns for 10 years | 96.57 | 38.74 | 249% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement