Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CWGFX vs MSFBX
CWGFX vs MSFBX Comparison
Open Charts CWGFX vs MSFBX
CWGFX vs MSFBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CWGFX vs. MSFBX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CWGFX is a Buy and MSFBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CWGFX has more cash in the bank: 158B vs. MSFBX (851M). CWGFX pays higher dividends than MSFBX: CWGFX (1.29) vs MSFBX (0.18). CWGFX was incepted earlier than MSFBX: CWGFX (26 years) vs MSFBX (25 years). MSFBX (1.21) is less costly to investors than CWGFX (0.79). CWGFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. MSFBX (35.00). CWGFX has a lower initial minimum investment than MSFBX: CWGFX (250) vs MSFBX (1000). CWGFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.47 vs. MSFBX (-21.70). CWGFX return over 5 years is better than : 32.66 vs. MSFBX (-21.29).
| CWGFX | MSFBX | CWGFX / MSFBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.79 | 1.21 | 65% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.79 | 1.21 | 65% |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.977 | -6.799 | -235% |
| Front Load | N/A | 5% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 158B | 851M | 18,566% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.29 | 0.18 | 714% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.47 | -21.70 | -53% |
| Returns for 3 years | 51.55 | -15.96 | -323% |
| Returns for 5 years | 32.66 | -21.29 | -153% |
| Returns for 10 years | 97.07 | 31.62 | 307% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement