Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CWGFX vs MVGAX
CWGFX vs MVGAX Comparison
Open Charts CWGFX vs MVGAX
CWGFX vs MVGAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CWGFX vs. MVGAX commentary
Jun 03, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CWGFX is a Buy and MVGAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CWGFX has more cash in the bank: 152B vs. MVGAX (294M). CWGFX (1.30) and MVGAX (1.29) have matching dividends . CWGFX was incepted earlier than MVGAX: CWGFX (25 years) vs MVGAX (13 years). MVGAX (1.02) is less costly to investors than CWGFX (0.79). CWGFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. MVGAX (31.00). CWGFX has a lower initial minimum investment than MVGAX: CWGFX (250) vs MVGAX (1000). CWGFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 22.43 vs. MVGAX (0.55). CWGFX return over 5 years is better than : 35.31 vs. MVGAX (15.28).
| CWGFX | MVGAX | CWGFX / MVGAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.79 | 0.99 | 80% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.79 | 1.02 | 77% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.636 | 3.076 | 508% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 152B | 294M | 51,701% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.30 | 1.29 | 100% |
| Returns for 1 year | 22.43 | 0.55 | 4,043% |
| Returns for 3 years | 54.53 | 23.47 | 232% |
| Returns for 5 years | 35.31 | 15.28 | 231% |
| Returns for 10 years | 99.29 | 71.79 | 138% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers