Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CWGFX vs MVGAX
CWGFX vs MVGAX Comparison
Open Charts CWGFX vs MVGAX
CWGFX vs MVGAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CWGFX vs. MVGAX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CWGFX is a Buy and MVGAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CWGFX has more cash in the bank: 158B vs. MVGAX (297M). CWGFX pays higher dividends than MVGAX: CWGFX (1.30) vs MVGAX (1.07). CWGFX was incepted earlier than MVGAX: CWGFX (25 years) vs MVGAX (13 years). MVGAX (1.02) is less costly to investors than CWGFX (0.79). CWGFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. MVGAX (31.00). CWGFX has a lower initial minimum investment than MVGAX: CWGFX (250) vs MVGAX (1000). CWGFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.10 vs. MVGAX (1.55). CWGFX return over 5 years is better than : 31.04 vs. MVGAX (14.17).
| CWGFX | MVGAX | CWGFX / MVGAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.79 | 0.99 | 80% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.79 | 1.02 | 77% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.209 | 4.885 | 270% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 158B | 297M | 53,199% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.30 | 1.07 | 122% |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.10 | 1.55 | 910% |
| Returns for 3 years | 44.01 | 22.81 | 193% |
| Returns for 5 years | 31.04 | 14.17 | 219% |
| Returns for 10 years | 92.50 | 69.70 | 133% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers