Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CWGFX vs MVGAX
CWGFX vs MVGAX Comparison
Open Charts CWGFX vs MVGAX
CWGFX vs MVGAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CWGFX vs. MVGAX commentary
Sep 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CWGFX is a Buy and MVGAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CWGFX has more cash in the bank: 158B vs. MVGAX (296M). CWGFX pays higher dividends than MVGAX: CWGFX (1.29) vs MVGAX (1.02). CWGFX was incepted earlier than MVGAX: CWGFX (26 years) vs MVGAX (13 years). MVGAX (1.02) is less costly to investors than CWGFX (0.79). CWGFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. MVGAX (31.00). CWGFX has a lower initial minimum investment than MVGAX: CWGFX (250) vs MVGAX (1000). CWGFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.47 vs. MVGAX (-0.79). CWGFX return over 5 years is better than : 32.66 vs. MVGAX (13.71).
| CWGFX | MVGAX | CWGFX / MVGAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.79 | 0.99 | 80% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.79 | 1.02 | 77% |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.977 | 7.038 | 227% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 158B | 296M | 53,378% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.29 | 1.02 | 126% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.47 | -0.79 | -1,458% |
| Returns for 3 years | 51.55 | 26.91 | 192% |
| Returns for 5 years | 32.66 | 13.71 | 238% |
| Returns for 10 years | 97.07 | 76.74 | 126% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement