Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CWGFX vs MVGBX
CWGFX vs MVGBX Comparison
Open Charts CWGFX vs MVGBX
CWGFX vs MVGBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CWGFX vs. MVGBX commentary
Sep 11, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CWGFX is a Hold and MVGBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CWGFX has more cash in the bank: 158B vs. MVGBX (297M). CWGFX pays higher dividends than MVGBX: CWGFX (1.29) vs MVGBX (0.34). CWGFX was incepted earlier than MVGBX: CWGFX (26 years) vs MVGBX (13 years). MVGBX (1.77) is less costly to investors than CWGFX (0.79). CWGFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. MVGBX (31.00). CWGFX has a lower initial minimum investment than MVGBX: CWGFX (250) vs MVGBX (1000). CWGFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.59 vs. MVGBX (-0.27). CWGFX return over 5 years is better than : 33.79 vs. MVGBX (10.54).
| CWGFX | MVGBX | CWGFX / MVGBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.79 | 1.74 | 45% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.79 | 1.77 | 45% |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.966 | 6.832 | 248% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 158B | 297M | 53,199% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.29 | 0.34 | 379% |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.59 | -0.27 | -5,052% |
| Returns for 3 years | 52.30 | 24.15 | 217% |
| Returns for 5 years | 33.79 | 10.54 | 320% |
| Returns for 10 years | 95.40 | 64.01 | 149% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers