Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CWGFX vs MVGLX
CWGFX vs MVGLX Comparison
Open Charts CWGFX vs MVGLX
CWGFX vs MVGLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CWGFX vs. MVGLX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CWGFX is a Buy and MVGLX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CWGFX has more cash in the bank: 158B vs. MVGLX (296M). CWGFX pays higher dividends than MVGLX: CWGFX (1.29) vs MVGLX (1.02). CWGFX was incepted earlier than MVGLX: CWGFX (26 years) vs MVGLX (13 years). MVGLX (1.02) is less costly to investors than CWGFX (0.79). CWGFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. MVGLX (31.00). MVGLX has a lower initial minimum investment than CWGFX: MVGLX (0) vs CWGFX (250). CWGFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.47 vs. MVGLX (-0.78). CWGFX return over 5 years is better than : 32.66 vs. MVGLX (15.20).
| CWGFX | MVGLX | CWGFX / MVGLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.79 | 0.99 | 80% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.79 | 1.02 | 77% |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.977 | 7.085 | 225% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 158B | 296M | 53,378% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.29 | 1.02 | 126% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.47 | -0.78 | -1,465% |
| Returns for 3 years | 51.55 | 27.01 | 191% |
| Returns for 5 years | 32.66 | 15.20 | 215% |
| Returns for 10 years | 97.07 | 82.05 | 118% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement