Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CWGFX vs MVGLX
CWGFX vs MVGLX Comparison
Open Charts CWGFX vs MVGLX
CWGFX vs MVGLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CWGFX vs. MVGLX commentary
Jul 06, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CWGFX is a Buy and MVGLX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CWGFX has more cash in the bank: 160B vs. MVGLX (297M). CWGFX pays higher dividends than MVGLX: CWGFX (1.30) vs MVGLX (1.07). CWGFX was incepted earlier than MVGLX: CWGFX (25 years) vs MVGLX (13 years). MVGLX (1.02) is less costly to investors than CWGFX (0.79). CWGFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. MVGLX (31.00). MVGLX has a lower initial minimum investment than CWGFX: MVGLX (0) vs CWGFX (250). CWGFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.67 vs. MVGLX (0.65). CWGFX return over 5 years is better than : 32.31 vs. MVGLX (16.65).
| CWGFX | MVGLX | CWGFX / MVGLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.79 | 0.99 | 80% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.79 | 1.02 | 77% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.183 | 4.877 | 291% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 160B | 297M | 53,872% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.30 | 1.07 | 122% |
| Returns for 1 year | 15.67 | 0.65 | 2,399% |
| Returns for 3 years | 48.14 | 23.82 | 202% |
| Returns for 5 years | 32.31 | 16.65 | 194% |
| Returns for 10 years | 99.41 | 76.04 | 131% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers