Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CWGFX vs MVGLX
CWGFX vs MVGLX Comparison
Open Charts CWGFX vs MVGLX
CWGFX vs MVGLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CWGFX vs. MVGLX commentary
Jun 16, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CWGFX is a Buy and MVGLX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CWGFX has more cash in the bank: 160B vs. MVGLX (298M). CWGFX (1.30) and MVGLX (1.29) have matching dividends . CWGFX was incepted earlier than MVGLX: CWGFX (25 years) vs MVGLX (13 years). MVGLX (1.02) is less costly to investors than CWGFX (0.79). CWGFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. MVGLX (31.00). MVGLX has a lower initial minimum investment than CWGFX: MVGLX (0) vs CWGFX (250). CWGFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 21.60 vs. MVGLX (1.74). CWGFX return over 5 years is better than : 35.28 vs. MVGLX (17.28).
| CWGFX | MVGLX | CWGFX / MVGLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.79 | 0.99 | 80% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.79 | 1.02 | 77% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.977 | 4.459 | 358% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 160B | 298M | 53,691% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.30 | 1.29 | 100% |
| Returns for 1 year | 21.60 | 1.74 | 1,239% |
| Returns for 3 years | 50.26 | 23.04 | 218% |
| Returns for 5 years | 35.28 | 17.28 | 204% |
| Returns for 10 years | 105.89 | 81.39 | 130% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement