Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CWGFX vs MWECX
CWGFX vs MWECX Comparison
Open Charts CWGFX vs MWECX
CWGFX vs MWECX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CWGFX vs. MWECX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CWGFX is a Hold and MWECX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CWGFX has more cash in the bank: 160B vs. MWECX (1.43B). CWGFX pays higher dividends than MWECX: CWGFX (1.30) vs MWECX (0.23). CWGFX was incepted earlier than MWECX: CWGFX (25 years) vs MWECX (32 years). MWECX (1.97) is less costly to investors than CWGFX (0.79). CWGFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. MWECX (17.00). CWGFX has a lower initial minimum investment than MWECX: CWGFX (250) vs MWECX (1000). CWGFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.82 vs. MWECX (-15.34). CWGFX return over 5 years is better than : 31.85 vs. MWECX (-39.25).
| CWGFX | MWECX | CWGFX / MWECX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.79 | 1.92 | 41% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.79 | 1.97 | 40% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 32 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.406 | -0.675 | -1,985% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 160B | 1.43B | 11,228% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.30 | 0.23 | 568% |
| Returns for 1 year | 18.82 | -15.34 | -123% |
| Returns for 3 years | 50.18 | -23.02 | -218% |
| Returns for 5 years | 31.85 | -39.25 | -81% |
| Returns for 10 years | 105.40 | 2.97 | 3,553% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement