Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CWGFX vs MWEFX
CWGFX vs MWEFX Comparison
Open Charts CWGFX vs MWEFX
CWGFX vs MWEFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CWGFX vs. MWEFX commentary
Sep 21, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CWGFX is a Hold and MWEFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CWGFX has more cash in the bank: 158B vs. MWEFX (1.38B). CWGFX pays higher dividends than MWEFX: CWGFX (1.29) vs MWEFX (0.72). CWGFX was incepted earlier than MWEFX: CWGFX (26 years) vs MWEFX (33 years). MWEFX (1.22) is less costly to investors than CWGFX (0.79). CWGFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. MWEFX (17.00). CWGFX has a lower initial minimum investment than MWEFX: CWGFX (250) vs MWEFX (1000). CWGFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.30 vs. MWEFX (-11.99). CWGFX return over 5 years is better than : 33.40 vs. MWEFX (-28.68).
| CWGFX | MWEFX | CWGFX / MWEFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.79 | 1.17 | 68% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.79 | 1.22 | 65% |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 33 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.352 | 3.155 | 487% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 158B | 1.38B | 11,466% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.29 | 0.72 | 180% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.30 | -11.99 | -86% |
| Returns for 3 years | 51.08 | -10.13 | -504% |
| Returns for 5 years | 33.40 | -28.68 | -116% |
| Returns for 10 years | 95.57 | 20.59 | 464% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers