Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CWGFX vs MWELX
CWGFX vs MWELX Comparison
Open Charts CWGFX vs MWELX
CWGFX vs MWELX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CWGFX vs. MWELX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CWGFX is a Buy and MWELX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CWGFX has more cash in the bank: 158B vs. MWELX (1.4B). CWGFX pays higher dividends than MWELX: CWGFX (1.29) vs MWELX (0.91). CWGFX was incepted earlier than MWELX: CWGFX (26 years) vs MWELX (21 years). MWELX (0.97) is less costly to investors than CWGFX (0.79). CWGFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. MWELX (17.00). MWELX has a lower initial minimum investment than CWGFX: MWELX (0) vs CWGFX (250). CWGFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.47 vs. MWELX (-11.71). CWGFX return over 5 years is better than : 32.66 vs. MWELX (-28.09).
| CWGFX | MWELX | CWGFX / MWELX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.79 | 0.92 | 86% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.79 | 0.97 | 81% |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 21 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.977 | 3.552 | 450% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 158B | 1.4B | 11,326% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.29 | 0.91 | 142% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.47 | -11.71 | -98% |
| Returns for 3 years | 51.55 | -9.04 | -570% |
| Returns for 5 years | 32.66 | -28.09 | -116% |
| Returns for 10 years | 97.07 | 26.04 | 373% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers