Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CWGFX vs MWEMX
CWGFX vs MWEMX Comparison
Open Charts CWGFX vs MWEMX
CWGFX vs MWEMX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CWGFX vs. MWEMX commentary
Jun 23, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CWGFX is a Hold and MWEMX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CWGFX has more cash in the bank: 160B vs. MWEMX (1.44B). CWGFX pays higher dividends than MWEMX: CWGFX (1.30) vs MWEMX (1.00). CWGFX was incepted earlier than MWEMX: CWGFX (25 years) vs MWEMX (14 years). MWEMX (0.88) is less costly to investors than CWGFX (0.79). CWGFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. MWEMX (17.00). MWEMX has a lower initial minimum investment than CWGFX: MWEMX (0) vs CWGFX (250). CWGFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 21.82 vs. MWEMX (-9.35). CWGFX return over 5 years is better than : 35.16 vs. MWEMX (-27.56).
| CWGFX | MWEMX | CWGFX / MWEMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.79 | 0.83 | 95% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.79 | 0.88 | 90% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.610 | -0.166 | -9,431% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 160B | 1.44B | 11,111% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.30 | 1.00 | 129% |
| Returns for 1 year | 21.82 | -9.35 | -233% |
| Returns for 3 years | 53.10 | -11.73 | -453% |
| Returns for 5 years | 35.16 | -27.56 | -128% |
| Returns for 10 years | 109.39 | 30.63 | 357% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement