Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CWGFX vs PORIX
CWGFX vs PORIX Comparison
Open Charts CWGFX vs PORIX
CWGFX vs PORIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CWGFX vs. PORIX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CWGFX is a Hold and PORIX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CWGFX has more cash in the bank: 160B vs. PORIX (754M). CWGFX pays higher dividends than PORIX: CWGFX (1.30) vs PORIX (0.58). CWGFX was incepted earlier than PORIX: CWGFX (25 years) vs PORIX (19 years). PORIX (1.01) is less costly to investors than CWGFX (0.79). CWGFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. PORIX (21.73). CWGFX has a lower initial minimum investment than PORIX: CWGFX (250) vs PORIX (100000). CWGFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.82 vs. PORIX (2.15). CWGFX return over 5 years is better than : 31.85 vs. PORIX (-7.39).
| CWGFX | PORIX | CWGFX / PORIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.79 | 0.99 | 80% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.79 | 1.01 | 78% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 19 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.406 | 7.228 | 185% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 100000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 160B | 754M | 21,220% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.30 | 0.58 | 223% |
| Returns for 1 year | 18.82 | 2.15 | 874% |
| Returns for 3 years | 50.18 | 6.39 | 785% |
| Returns for 5 years | 31.85 | -7.39 | -431% |
| Returns for 10 years | 105.40 | 85.54 | 123% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement