Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CWGFX vs PORTX
CWGFX vs PORTX Comparison
Open Charts CWGFX vs PORTX
CWGFX vs PORTX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CWGFX vs. PORTX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CWGFX is a Hold and PORTX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CWGFX has more cash in the bank: 160B vs. PORTX (754M). CWGFX pays higher dividends than PORTX: CWGFX (1.30) vs PORTX (0.35). CWGFX was incepted earlier than PORTX: CWGFX (25 years) vs PORTX (27 years). PORTX (1.26) is less costly to investors than CWGFX (0.79). CWGFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. PORTX (21.73). PORTX has a lower initial minimum investment than CWGFX: PORTX (0) vs CWGFX (250). CWGFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.82 vs. PORTX (2.00). CWGFX return over 5 years is better than : 31.85 vs. PORTX (-8.06).
| CWGFX | PORTX | CWGFX / PORTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.79 | 1.24 | 64% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.79 | 1.26 | 63% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.406 | 7.103 | 189% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 160B | 754M | 21,220% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.30 | 0.35 | 368% |
| Returns for 1 year | 18.82 | 2.00 | 941% |
| Returns for 3 years | 50.18 | 5.83 | 861% |
| Returns for 5 years | 31.85 | -8.06 | -395% |
| Returns for 10 years | 105.40 | 82.55 | 128% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement