Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CWGFX vs PXEAX
CWGFX vs PXEAX Comparison
Open Charts CWGFX vs PXEAX
CWGFX vs PXEAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CWGFX vs. PXEAX commentary
Aug 03, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CWGFX is a Buy and PXEAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CWGFX has more cash in the bank: 158B vs. PXEAX (1.67B). CWGFX pays higher dividends than PXEAX: CWGFX (1.31) vs PXEAX (0.18). CWGFX was incepted earlier than PXEAX: CWGFX (25 years) vs PXEAX (13 years). PXEAX (1.18) is less costly to investors than CWGFX (0.79). CWGFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. PXEAX (39.00). CWGFX has a lower initial minimum investment than PXEAX: CWGFX (250) vs PXEAX (1000). CWGFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.55 vs. PXEAX (-5.06). CWGFX return over 5 years is better than : 32.96 vs. PXEAX (-0.65).
| CWGFX | PXEAX | CWGFX / PXEAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.79 | 1.18 | 67% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.79 | 1.18 | 67% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.986 | 15.580 | 90% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 158B | 1.67B | 9,484% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.31 | 0.18 | 715% |
| Returns for 1 year | 15.55 | -5.06 | -307% |
| Returns for 3 years | 43.96 | 10.87 | 404% |
| Returns for 5 years | 32.96 | -0.65 | -5,034% |
| Returns for 10 years | 93.69 | 94.43 | 99% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers