Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CWGFX vs RGLAX
CWGFX vs RGLAX Comparison
Open Charts CWGFX vs RGLAX
CWGFX vs RGLAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CWGFX vs. RGLAX commentary
Sep 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CWGFX is a Buy and RGLAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CWGFX has more cash in the bank: 158B vs. RGLAX (21.7B). CWGFX pays higher dividends than RGLAX: CWGFX (1.29) vs RGLAX (0.25). CWGFX was incepted earlier than RGLAX: CWGFX (26 years) vs RGLAX (7 years). RGLAX (1.51) is less costly to investors than CWGFX (0.79). CWGFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. RGLAX (35.00). CWGFX (250) and RGLAX (250) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. RGLAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.36 vs. CWGFX (11.47). RGLAX return over 5 years is better than : 47.15 vs. CWGFX (32.66).
| CWGFX | RGLAX | CWGFX / RGLAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.79 | 1.51 | 52% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.79 | 1.51 | 52% |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.977 | 9.492 | 168% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 250 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 158B | 21.7B | 728% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.29 | 0.25 | 509% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.47 | 13.36 | 86% |
| Returns for 3 years | 51.55 | 56.31 | 92% |
| Returns for 5 years | 32.66 | 47.15 | 69% |
| Returns for 10 years | 97.07 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers