Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CWGFX vs RGLAX
CWGFX vs RGLAX Comparison
Open Charts CWGFX vs RGLAX
CWGFX vs RGLAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CWGFX vs. RGLAX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CWGFX is a Hold and RGLAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CWGFX has more cash in the bank: 160B vs. RGLAX (21.5B). CWGFX pays higher dividends than RGLAX: CWGFX (1.30) vs RGLAX (0.26). CWGFX was incepted earlier than RGLAX: CWGFX (25 years) vs RGLAX (7 years). RGLAX (1.51) is less costly to investors than CWGFX (0.79). CWGFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. RGLAX (35.00). CWGFX (250) and RGLAX (250) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. RGLAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 23.51 vs. CWGFX (18.82). RGLAX return over 5 years is better than : 51.22 vs. CWGFX (31.85).
| CWGFX | RGLAX | CWGFX / RGLAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.79 | 1.51 | 52% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.79 | 1.51 | 52% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.406 | 10.127 | 132% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 250 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 160B | 21.5B | 744% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.30 | 0.26 | 506% |
| Returns for 1 year | 18.82 | 23.51 | 80% |
| Returns for 3 years | 50.18 | 57.14 | 88% |
| Returns for 5 years | 31.85 | 51.22 | 62% |
| Returns for 10 years | 105.40 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement