Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CWGFX vs RGLBX
CWGFX vs RGLBX Comparison
Open Charts CWGFX vs RGLBX
CWGFX vs RGLBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CWGFX vs. RGLBX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CWGFX is a Hold and RGLBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CWGFX has more cash in the bank: 160B vs. RGLBX (21.5B). CWGFX pays higher dividends than RGLBX: CWGFX (1.30) vs RGLBX (0.30). CWGFX was incepted earlier than RGLBX: CWGFX (25 years) vs RGLBX (7 years). RGLBX (1.53) is less costly to investors than CWGFX (0.79). CWGFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. RGLBX (35.00). CWGFX (250) and RGLBX (250) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. RGLBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 19.99 vs. CWGFX (18.82). RGLBX return over 5 years is better than : 45.55 vs. CWGFX (31.85).
| CWGFX | RGLBX | CWGFX / RGLBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.79 | 1.53 | 52% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.79 | 1.53 | 52% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.406 | 7.871 | 170% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 250 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 160B | 21.5B | 744% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.30 | 0.30 | 434% |
| Returns for 1 year | 18.82 | 19.99 | 94% |
| Returns for 3 years | 50.18 | 53.50 | 94% |
| Returns for 5 years | 31.85 | 45.55 | 70% |
| Returns for 10 years | 105.40 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement