Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CWGFX vs RGLBX
CWGFX vs RGLBX Comparison
Open Charts CWGFX vs RGLBX
CWGFX vs RGLBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CWGFX vs. RGLBX commentary
Aug 03, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CWGFX is a Buy and RGLBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CWGFX has more cash in the bank: 158B vs. RGLBX (21.6B). CWGFX pays higher dividends than RGLBX: CWGFX (1.31) vs RGLBX (0.30). CWGFX was incepted earlier than RGLBX: CWGFX (25 years) vs RGLBX (7 years). RGLBX (1.53) is less costly to investors than CWGFX (0.79). CWGFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. RGLBX (35.00). CWGFX (250) and RGLBX (250) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. RGLBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.03 vs. CWGFX (15.55). RGLBX return over 5 years is better than : 47.50 vs. CWGFX (32.96).
| CWGFX | RGLBX | CWGFX / RGLBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.79 | 1.53 | 52% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.79 | 1.53 | 52% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.986 | 9.517 | 147% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 250 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 158B | 21.6B | 731% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.31 | 0.30 | 441% |
| Returns for 1 year | 15.55 | 18.03 | 86% |
| Returns for 3 years | 43.96 | 50.92 | 86% |
| Returns for 5 years | 32.96 | 47.50 | 69% |
| Returns for 10 years | 93.69 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers