Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CWGFX vs RGLDX
CWGFX vs RGLDX Comparison
Open Charts CWGFX vs RGLDX
CWGFX vs RGLDX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CWGFX vs. RGLDX commentary
Jul 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CWGFX is a Buy and RGLDX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CWGFX has more cash in the bank: 160B vs. RGLDX (21.5B). CWGFX pays higher dividends than RGLDX: CWGFX (1.30) vs RGLDX (0.50). CWGFX was incepted earlier than RGLDX: CWGFX (25 years) vs RGLDX (7 years). RGLDX (1.17) is less costly to investors than CWGFX (0.79). CWGFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. RGLDX (35.00). CWGFX (250) and RGLDX (250) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. RGLDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 19.07 vs. CWGFX (15.67). RGLDX return over 5 years is better than : 50.68 vs. CWGFX (32.31).
| CWGFX | RGLDX | CWGFX / RGLDX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.79 | 1.10 | 72% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.79 | 1.17 | 68% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.183 | 10.025 | 141% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 250 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 160B | 21.5B | 744% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.30 | 0.50 | 262% |
| Returns for 1 year | 15.67 | 19.07 | 82% |
| Returns for 3 years | 48.14 | 55.49 | 87% |
| Returns for 5 years | 32.31 | 50.68 | 64% |
| Returns for 10 years | 99.41 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers