Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CWGFX vs RGLDX
CWGFX vs RGLDX Comparison
Open Charts CWGFX vs RGLDX
CWGFX vs RGLDX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CWGFX vs. RGLDX commentary
Jun 15, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CWGFX is a Buy and RGLDX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CWGFX has more cash in the bank: 160B vs. RGLDX (21.5B). CWGFX pays higher dividends than RGLDX: CWGFX (1.30) vs RGLDX (0.51). CWGFX was incepted earlier than RGLDX: CWGFX (25 years) vs RGLDX (7 years). RGLDX (1.17) is less costly to investors than CWGFX (0.79). CWGFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. RGLDX (35.00). CWGFX (250) and RGLDX (250) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. RGLDX (18.67) and CWGFX (17.85) have marching annual gain over last year. RGLDX return over 5 years is better than : 47.63 vs. CWGFX (31.88).
| CWGFX | RGLDX | CWGFX / RGLDX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.79 | 1.10 | 72% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.79 | 1.17 | 68% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.611 | 7.899 | 172% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 250 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 160B | 21.5B | 744% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.30 | 0.51 | 257% |
| Returns for 1 year | 17.85 | 18.67 | 96% |
| Returns for 3 years | 48.83 | 54.06 | 90% |
| Returns for 5 years | 31.88 | 47.63 | 67% |
| Returns for 10 years | 101.83 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers