Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CWGFX vs RGLEX
CWGFX vs RGLEX Comparison
Open Charts CWGFX vs RGLEX
CWGFX vs RGLEX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CWGFX vs. RGLEX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CWGFX is a Hold and RGLEX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CWGFX has more cash in the bank: 160B vs. RGLEX (21.5B). CWGFX pays higher dividends than RGLEX: CWGFX (1.30) vs RGLEX (0.80). CWGFX was incepted earlier than RGLEX: CWGFX (25 years) vs RGLEX (7 years). RGLEX (0.80) and CWGFX (0.79) have similar cost to investors . CWGFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. RGLEX (35.00). CWGFX (250) and RGLEX (250) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. RGLEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 20.86 vs. CWGFX (18.82). RGLEX return over 5 years is better than : 50.81 vs. CWGFX (31.85).
| CWGFX | RGLEX | CWGFX / RGLEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.79 | 0.80 | 99% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.79 | 0.80 | 99% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.406 | 8.274 | 162% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 250 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 160B | 21.5B | 744% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.30 | 0.80 | 162% |
| Returns for 1 year | 18.82 | 20.86 | 90% |
| Returns for 3 years | 50.18 | 56.92 | 88% |
| Returns for 5 years | 31.85 | 50.81 | 63% |
| Returns for 10 years | 105.40 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement