Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CWGFX vs RGLEX
CWGFX vs RGLEX Comparison
Open Charts CWGFX vs RGLEX
CWGFX vs RGLEX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CWGFX vs. RGLEX commentary
Sep 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CWGFX is a Buy and RGLEX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CWGFX has more cash in the bank: 158B vs. RGLEX (21.7B). CWGFX pays higher dividends than RGLEX: CWGFX (1.29) vs RGLEX (0.79). CWGFX was incepted earlier than RGLEX: CWGFX (26 years) vs RGLEX (7 years). RGLEX (0.80) and CWGFX (0.79) have similar cost to investors . CWGFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. RGLEX (35.00). CWGFX (250) and RGLEX (250) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. RGLEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.01 vs. CWGFX (11.47). RGLEX return over 5 years is better than : 51.21 vs. CWGFX (32.66).
| CWGFX | RGLEX | CWGFX / RGLEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.79 | 0.80 | 99% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.79 | 0.80 | 99% |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.977 | 9.936 | 161% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 250 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 158B | 21.7B | 728% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.29 | 0.79 | 163% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.47 | 14.01 | 82% |
| Returns for 3 years | 51.55 | 59.17 | 87% |
| Returns for 5 years | 32.66 | 51.21 | 64% |
| Returns for 10 years | 97.07 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers