Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CWGFX vs RGLFX
CWGFX vs RGLFX Comparison
Open Charts CWGFX vs RGLFX
CWGFX vs RGLFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CWGFX vs. RGLFX commentary
Jun 15, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CWGFX is a Buy and RGLFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CWGFX has more cash in the bank: 160B vs. RGLFX (21.5B). CWGFX pays higher dividends than RGLFX: CWGFX (1.30) vs RGLFX (1.04). CWGFX was incepted earlier than RGLFX: CWGFX (25 years) vs RGLFX (7 years). CWGFX (0.79) is less costly to investors than RGLFX (0.51). CWGFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. RGLFX (35.00). CWGFX (250) and RGLFX (250) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. RGLFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 19.31 vs. CWGFX (17.85). RGLFX return over 5 years is better than : 51.98 vs. CWGFX (31.88).
| CWGFX | RGLFX | CWGFX / RGLFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.79 | 0.51 | 155% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.79 | 0.51 | 155% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.611 | 8.178 | 166% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 250 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 160B | 21.5B | 744% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.30 | 1.04 | 124% |
| Returns for 1 year | 17.85 | 19.31 | 92% |
| Returns for 3 years | 48.83 | 56.67 | 86% |
| Returns for 5 years | 31.88 | 51.98 | 61% |
| Returns for 10 years | 101.83 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers