Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CWGFX vs RGLFX
CWGFX vs RGLFX Comparison
Open Charts CWGFX vs RGLFX
CWGFX vs RGLFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CWGFX vs. RGLFX commentary
Aug 23, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CWGFX is a StrongBuy and RGLFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CWGFX has more cash in the bank: 156B vs. RGLFX (21.5B). CWGFX pays higher dividends than RGLFX: CWGFX (1.31) vs RGLFX (1.04). CWGFX was incepted earlier than RGLFX: CWGFX (25 years) vs RGLFX (7 years). CWGFX (0.79) is less costly to investors than RGLFX (0.51). CWGFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. RGLFX (35.00). CWGFX (250) and RGLFX (250) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. RGLFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 19.61 vs. CWGFX (17.16). RGLFX return over 5 years is better than : 58.12 vs. CWGFX (36.91).
| CWGFX | RGLFX | CWGFX / RGLFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.79 | 0.51 | 155% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.79 | 0.51 | 155% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.994 | 11.914 | 143% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 250 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 156B | 21.5B | 726% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.31 | 1.04 | 127% |
| Returns for 1 year | 17.16 | 19.61 | 88% |
| Returns for 3 years | 54.63 | 63.85 | 86% |
| Returns for 5 years | 36.91 | 58.12 | 64% |
| Returns for 10 years | 94.42 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement