Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CWGFX vs RGLFX
CWGFX vs RGLFX Comparison
Open Charts CWGFX vs RGLFX
CWGFX vs RGLFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CWGFX vs. RGLFX commentary
Sep 15, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CWGFX is a Buy and RGLFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CWGFX has more cash in the bank: 158B vs. RGLFX (21.7B). CWGFX pays higher dividends than RGLFX: CWGFX (1.29) vs RGLFX (1.03). CWGFX was incepted earlier than RGLFX: CWGFX (26 years) vs RGLFX (7 years). CWGFX (0.79) is less costly to investors than RGLFX (0.51). CWGFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. RGLFX (35.00). CWGFX (250) and RGLFX (250) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. RGLFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.50 vs. CWGFX (10.15). RGLFX return over 5 years is better than : 51.82 vs. CWGFX (30.55).
| CWGFX | RGLFX | CWGFX / RGLFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.79 | 0.51 | 155% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.79 | 0.51 | 155% |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.409 | 9.165 | 157% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 250 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 158B | 21.7B | 728% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.29 | 1.03 | 125% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.15 | 13.50 | 75% |
| Returns for 3 years | 49.03 | 59.19 | 83% |
| Returns for 5 years | 30.55 | 51.82 | 59% |
| Returns for 10 years | 94.97 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement