Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CWGFX vs RGLGX
CWGFX vs RGLGX Comparison
Open Charts CWGFX vs RGLGX
CWGFX vs RGLGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CWGFX vs. RGLGX commentary
Jun 16, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CWGFX is a Buy and RGLGX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CWGFX has more cash in the bank: 160B vs. RGLGX (21.5B). CWGFX pays higher dividends than RGLGX: CWGFX (1.30) vs RGLGX (1.08). CWGFX was incepted earlier than RGLGX: CWGFX (25 years) vs RGLGX (7 years). CWGFX (0.79) is less costly to investors than RGLGX (0.45). CWGFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. RGLGX (35.00). CWGFX (250) and RGLGX (250) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. RGLGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 22.89 vs. CWGFX (21.60). RGLGX return over 5 years is better than : 55.52 vs. CWGFX (35.28).
| CWGFX | RGLGX | CWGFX / RGLGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.79 | 0.45 | 176% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.79 | 0.45 | 176% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.977 | 9.972 | 160% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 250 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 160B | 21.5B | 744% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.30 | 1.08 | 120% |
| Returns for 1 year | 21.60 | 22.89 | 94% |
| Returns for 3 years | 50.26 | 57.75 | 87% |
| Returns for 5 years | 35.28 | 55.52 | 64% |
| Returns for 10 years | 105.89 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement