Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CWGFX vs RGLGX
CWGFX vs RGLGX Comparison
Open Charts CWGFX vs RGLGX
CWGFX vs RGLGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
A.I.Advisor
published Highlights
Market Cap
The average market capitalization across the group is 88.74B. The market cap for tickers in the group ranges from 21.48B to 155.99B. CWGFX holds the highest valuation in this group at 155.99B. The lowest valued company is RGLGX at 21.48B.
High and low price notable news
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the group was -0%. For the same group, the average monthly price growth was -1%, and the average quarterly price growth was 13%. CWGFX experienced the highest price growth at -0%, while RGLGX experienced the biggest fall at -1%.
Volume
The average weekly volume growth across all stocks in the group was 0%. For the same stocks of the group, the average monthly volume growth was 0% and the average quarterly volume growth was 0%
Fundamental Analysis Ratings
The average fundamental analysis ratings, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, are as follows
Valuation Rating:
P/E Growth Rating:
Price Growth Rating:
SMR Rating:
Profit Risk Rating:
Seasonality Score: (-100 ... +100)
CWGFX vs. RGLGX commentary
Sep 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CWGFX is a Hold and RGLGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CWGFX has more cash in the bank: 156B vs. RGLGX (21.5B). CWGFX pays higher dividends than RGLGX: CWGFX (1.29) vs RGLGX (1.06). CWGFX was incepted earlier than RGLGX: CWGFX (25 years) vs RGLGX (7 years). CWGFX (0.79) is less costly to investors than RGLGX (0.45). CWGFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. RGLGX (35.00). CWGFX (250) and RGLGX (250) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. RGLGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.65 vs. CWGFX (15.43). RGLGX return over 5 years is better than : 53.75 vs. CWGFX (31.94).
| CWGFX | RGLGX | CWGFX / RGLGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.79 | 0.45 | 176% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.79 | 0.45 | 176% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.768 | 11.064 | 152% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 250 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 156B | 21.5B | 726% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.29 | 1.06 | 121% |
| Returns for 1 year | 15.43 | 17.65 | 87% |
| Returns for 3 years | 51.71 | 61.11 | 85% |
| Returns for 5 years | 31.94 | 53.75 | 59% |
| Returns for 10 years | 92.37 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement