Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CWGFX vs RGLHX
CWGFX vs RGLHX Comparison
Open Charts CWGFX vs RGLHX
CWGFX vs RGLHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CWGFX vs. RGLHX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CWGFX is a Buy and RGLHX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CWGFX has more cash in the bank: 158B vs. RGLHX (21.7B). CWGFX pays higher dividends than RGLHX: CWGFX (1.29) vs RGLHX (0.47). CWGFX was incepted earlier than RGLHX: CWGFX (26 years) vs RGLHX (7 years). RGLHX (1.24) is less costly to investors than CWGFX (0.79). CWGFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. RGLHX (35.00). CWGFX (250) and RGLHX (250) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. RGLHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.60 vs. CWGFX (11.47). RGLHX return over 5 years is better than : 48.45 vs. CWGFX (32.66).
| CWGFX | RGLHX | CWGFX / RGLHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.79 | 1.24 | 64% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.79 | 1.24 | 64% |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.977 | 9.619 | 166% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 250 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 158B | 21.7B | 728% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.29 | 0.47 | 272% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.47 | 13.60 | 84% |
| Returns for 3 years | 51.55 | 57.40 | 90% |
| Returns for 5 years | 32.66 | 48.45 | 67% |
| Returns for 10 years | 97.07 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement