Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CWGFX vs RGLHX
CWGFX vs RGLHX Comparison
Open Charts CWGFX vs RGLHX
CWGFX vs RGLHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CWGFX vs. RGLHX commentary
Jun 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CWGFX is a Buy and RGLHX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CWGFX has more cash in the bank: 152B vs. RGLHX (20.6B). CWGFX pays higher dividends than RGLHX: CWGFX (1.30) vs RGLHX (0.48). CWGFX was incepted earlier than RGLHX: CWGFX (25 years) vs RGLHX (7 years). RGLHX (1.24) is less costly to investors than CWGFX (0.79). CWGFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. RGLHX (35.00). CWGFX (250) and RGLHX (250) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. CWGFX (22.43) and RGLHX (21.62) have marching annual gain over last year. RGLHX return over 5 years is better than : 50.74 vs. CWGFX (35.31).
| CWGFX | RGLHX | CWGFX / RGLHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.79 | 1.24 | 64% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.79 | 1.24 | 64% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.636 | 9.302 | 168% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 250 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 152B | 20.6B | 738% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.30 | 0.48 | 271% |
| Returns for 1 year | 22.43 | 21.62 | 104% |
| Returns for 3 years | 54.53 | 57.41 | 95% |
| Returns for 5 years | 35.31 | 50.74 | 70% |
| Returns for 10 years | 99.29 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers