Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CWGFX vs RGLJX
CWGFX vs RGLJX Comparison
Open Charts CWGFX vs RGLJX
CWGFX vs RGLJX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CWGFX vs. RGLJX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CWGFX is a Hold and RGLJX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CWGFX has more cash in the bank: 160B vs. RGLJX (21.5B). CWGFX pays higher dividends than RGLJX: CWGFX (1.30) vs RGLJX (0.97). CWGFX was incepted earlier than RGLJX: CWGFX (25 years) vs RGLJX (7 years). CWGFX (0.79) is less costly to investors than RGLJX (0.71). CWGFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. RGLJX (35.00). CWGFX (250) and RGLJX (250) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. RGLJX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 24.54 vs. CWGFX (18.82). RGLJX return over 5 years is better than : 56.55 vs. CWGFX (31.85).
| CWGFX | RGLJX | CWGFX / RGLJX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.79 | 0.60 | 132% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.79 | 0.71 | 111% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.406 | 10.554 | 127% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 250 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 160B | 21.5B | 744% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.30 | 0.97 | 133% |
| Returns for 1 year | 18.82 | 24.54 | 77% |
| Returns for 3 years | 50.18 | 61.03 | 82% |
| Returns for 5 years | 31.85 | 56.55 | 56% |
| Returns for 10 years | 105.40 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement