Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CWGFX vs RGLJX
CWGFX vs RGLJX Comparison
Open Charts CWGFX vs RGLJX
CWGFX vs RGLJX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CWGFX vs. RGLJX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CWGFX is a Buy and RGLJX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CWGFX has more cash in the bank: 158B vs. RGLJX (21.6B). CWGFX pays higher dividends than RGLJX: CWGFX (1.30) vs RGLJX (0.96). CWGFX was incepted earlier than RGLJX: CWGFX (25 years) vs RGLJX (7 years). CWGFX (0.79) is less costly to investors than RGLJX (0.71). CWGFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. RGLJX (35.00). CWGFX (250) and RGLJX (250) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. RGLJX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.72 vs. CWGFX (14.10). RGLJX return over 5 years is better than : 52.42 vs. CWGFX (31.04).
| CWGFX | RGLJX | CWGFX / RGLJX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.79 | 0.60 | 132% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.79 | 0.71 | 111% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.209 | 8.860 | 149% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 250 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 158B | 21.6B | 731% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.30 | 0.96 | 136% |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.10 | 17.72 | 80% |
| Returns for 3 years | 44.01 | 53.98 | 82% |
| Returns for 5 years | 31.04 | 52.42 | 59% |
| Returns for 10 years | 92.50 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers