Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CWGFX vs SRICX
CWGFX vs SRICX Comparison
Open Charts CWGFX vs SRICX
CWGFX vs SRICX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CWGFX vs. SRICX commentary
Sep 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CWGFX is a StrongBuy and SRICX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CWGFX has more cash in the bank: 156B vs. SRICX (21.2M). SRICX pays higher dividends than CWGFX: SRICX (1.43) vs CWGFX (1.29). CWGFX was incepted earlier than SRICX: CWGFX (25 years) vs SRICX (19 years). SRICX (2.99) is less costly to investors than CWGFX (0.79). CWGFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. SRICX (20.00). CWGFX has a lower initial minimum investment than SRICX: CWGFX (250) vs SRICX (1000). CWGFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.12 vs. SRICX (4.37). CWGFX return over 5 years is better than : 31.78 vs. SRICX (-10.45).
| CWGFX | SRICX | CWGFX / SRICX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.79 | 0.90 | 88% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.79 | 2.99 | 26% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 19 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.627 | 9.258 | 180% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 156B | 21.2M | 735,849% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.29 | 1.43 | 90% |
| Returns for 1 year | 16.12 | 4.37 | 369% |
| Returns for 3 years | 50.73 | 21.22 | 239% |
| Returns for 5 years | 31.78 | -10.45 | -304% |
| Returns for 10 years | 93.77 | -6.36 | -1,474% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement