Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CWGFX vs TEPLX
CWGFX vs TEPLX Comparison
Open Charts CWGFX vs TEPLX
CWGFX vs TEPLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CWGFX vs. TEPLX commentary
Sep 19, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CWGFX is a Hold and TEPLX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CWGFX has more cash in the bank: 158B vs. TEPLX (8.98B). CWGFX pays higher dividends than TEPLX: CWGFX (1.29) vs TEPLX (0.55). CWGFX was incepted earlier than TEPLX: CWGFX (26 years) vs TEPLX (72 years). TEPLX (1.03) is less costly to investors than CWGFX (0.79). TEPLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 75.81 vs. CWGFX (44.00). CWGFX has a lower initial minimum investment than TEPLX: CWGFX (250) vs TEPLX (1000). CWGFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.60 vs. TEPLX (-4.80). CWGFX return over 5 years is better than : 33.22 vs. TEPLX (22.98).
| CWGFX | TEPLX | CWGFX / TEPLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.79 | 1.03 | 77% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.79 | 1.03 | 77% |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 72 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.196 | 3.435 | 442% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 158B | 8.98B | 1,760% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.29 | 0.55 | 233% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.60 | -4.80 | -221% |
| Returns for 3 years | 50.42 | 25.13 | 201% |
| Returns for 5 years | 33.22 | 22.98 | 145% |
| Returns for 10 years | 95.79 | 37.79 | 253% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement