Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CWGFX vs THORX
CWGFX vs THORX Comparison
Open Charts CWGFX vs THORX
CWGFX vs THORX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CWGFX vs. THORX commentary
Aug 10, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CWGFX is a Buy and THORX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CWGFX has more cash in the bank: 158B vs. THORX (1.92B). CWGFX pays higher dividends than THORX: CWGFX (1.31) vs THORX (0.66). CWGFX was incepted earlier than THORX: CWGFX (25 years) vs THORX (19 years). THORX (2.42) is less costly to investors than CWGFX (0.79). CWGFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. THORX (15.07). THORX has a lower initial minimum investment than CWGFX: THORX (0) vs CWGFX (250). THORX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 24.51 vs. CWGFX (17.92). THORX return over 5 years is better than : 46.70 vs. CWGFX (35.43).
| CWGFX | THORX | CWGFX / THORX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.79 | 1.49 | 53% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.79 | 2.42 | 33% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 19 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 17.079 | 15.889 | 107% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 158B | 1.92B | 8,251% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.31 | 0.66 | 199% |
| Returns for 1 year | 17.92 | 24.51 | 73% |
| Returns for 3 years | 50.35 | 68.60 | 73% |
| Returns for 5 years | 35.43 | 46.70 | 76% |
| Returns for 10 years | 96.02 | 146.01 | 66% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers