Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CWGFX vs TNBAX
CWGFX vs TNBAX Comparison
Open Charts CWGFX vs TNBAX
CWGFX vs TNBAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CWGFX vs. TNBAX commentary
Aug 03, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CWGFX is a Buy and TNBAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CWGFX has more cash in the bank: 158B vs. TNBAX (291M). CWGFX pays higher dividends than TNBAX: CWGFX (1.31) vs TNBAX (0.56). CWGFX was incepted earlier than TNBAX: CWGFX (25 years) vs TNBAX (12 years). TNBAX (1.33) is less costly to investors than CWGFX (0.79). CWGFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. TNBAX (33.00). CWGFX has a lower initial minimum investment than TNBAX: CWGFX (250) vs TNBAX (1000). CWGFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.55 vs. TNBAX (7.59). CWGFX return over 5 years is better than : 32.96 vs. TNBAX (30.36).
| CWGFX | TNBAX | CWGFX / TNBAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.79 | 1.10 | 72% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.79 | 1.33 | 59% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.986 | 6.093 | 230% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 158B | 291M | 54,296% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.31 | 0.56 | 236% |
| Returns for 1 year | 15.55 | 7.59 | 205% |
| Returns for 3 years | 43.96 | 36.57 | 120% |
| Returns for 5 years | 32.96 | 30.36 | 109% |
| Returns for 10 years | 93.69 | 120.74 | 78% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement