Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CWGFX vs TNBAX
CWGFX vs TNBAX Comparison
Open Charts CWGFX vs TNBAX
CWGFX vs TNBAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CWGFX vs. TNBAX commentary
Aug 23, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CWGFX is a StrongBuy and TNBAX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CWGFX has more cash in the bank: 156B vs. TNBAX (296M). CWGFX pays higher dividends than TNBAX: CWGFX (1.31) vs TNBAX (0.56). CWGFX was incepted earlier than TNBAX: CWGFX (25 years) vs TNBAX (12 years). TNBAX (1.33) is less costly to investors than CWGFX (0.79). CWGFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. TNBAX (33.00). CWGFX has a lower initial minimum investment than TNBAX: CWGFX (250) vs TNBAX (1000). CWGFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.16 vs. TNBAX (6.75). CWGFX return over 5 years is better than : 36.91 vs. TNBAX (30.05).
| CWGFX | TNBAX | CWGFX / TNBAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.79 | 1.10 | 72% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.79 | 1.33 | 59% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.994 | 7.419 | 229% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 156B | 296M | 52,703% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.31 | 0.56 | 236% |
| Returns for 1 year | 17.16 | 6.75 | 254% |
| Returns for 3 years | 54.63 | 43.66 | 125% |
| Returns for 5 years | 36.91 | 30.05 | 123% |
| Returns for 10 years | 94.42 | 121.82 | 78% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement