Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CWGFX vs VICVX
CWGFX vs VICVX Comparison
Open Charts CWGFX vs VICVX
CWGFX vs VICVX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CWGFX vs. VICVX commentary
Jun 18, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CWGFX is a Hold and VICVX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CWGFX has more cash in the bank: 160B vs. VICVX (52.6M). CWGFX pays higher dividends than VICVX: CWGFX (1.30) vs VICVX (1.23). CWGFX was incepted earlier than VICVX: CWGFX (25 years) vs VICVX (12 years). VICVX (1.66) is less costly to investors than CWGFX (0.79). CWGFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. VICVX (14.00). CWGFX has a lower initial minimum investment than VICVX: CWGFX (250) vs VICVX (2000). CWGFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 21.14 vs. VICVX (0.15). CWGFX return over 5 years is better than : 36.42 vs. VICVX (-22.91).
| CWGFX | VICVX | CWGFX / VICVX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.79 | 1.48 | 53% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.79 | 1.66 | 48% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.370 | 6.932 | 222% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2000 | 13% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 160B | 52.6M | 304,183% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.30 | 1.23 | 106% |
| Returns for 1 year | 21.14 | 0.15 | 14,421% |
| Returns for 3 years | 49.47 | -0.70 | -7,060% |
| Returns for 5 years | 36.42 | -22.91 | -159% |
| Returns for 10 years | 104.81 | -17.54 | -598% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement