Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CWGFX vs VMNVX
CWGFX vs VMNVX Comparison
Open Charts CWGFX vs VMNVX
CWGFX vs VMNVX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CWGFX vs. VMNVX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CWGFX is a Buy and VMNVX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CWGFX has more cash in the bank: 158B vs. VMNVX (2B). VMNVX pays higher dividends than CWGFX: VMNVX (2.17) vs CWGFX (1.29). CWGFX was incepted earlier than VMNVX: CWGFX (26 years) vs VMNVX (13 years). CWGFX (0.79) is less costly to investors than VMNVX (0.14). CWGFX (44.00) and VMNVX (43.00) have comparable annual turnover. CWGFX has a lower initial minimum investment than VMNVX: CWGFX (250) vs VMNVX (50000). CWGFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.47 vs. VMNVX (0.64). CWGFX return over 5 years is better than : 32.66 vs. VMNVX (16.76).
| CWGFX | VMNVX | CWGFX / VMNVX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.79 | 0.14 | 564% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.79 | 0.14 | 564% |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.977 | 8.912 | 179% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 50000 | 1% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 158B | 2B | 7,900% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.29 | 2.17 | 59% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.47 | 0.64 | 1,802% |
| Returns for 3 years | 51.55 | 24.94 | 207% |
| Returns for 5 years | 32.66 | 16.76 | 195% |
| Returns for 10 years | 97.07 | 50.76 | 191% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement