Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CWGFX vs VPRDX
CWGFX vs VPRDX Comparison
Open Charts CWGFX vs VPRDX
CWGFX vs VPRDX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CWGFX vs. VPRDX commentary
Jun 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CWGFX is a Buy and VPRDX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CWGFX has more cash in the bank: 160B vs. VPRDX (65.2M). CWGFX pays higher dividends than VPRDX: CWGFX (1.30) vs VPRDX (0.69). CWGFX was incepted earlier than VPRDX: CWGFX (25 years) vs VPRDX (10 years). VPRDX (0.89) is less costly to investors than CWGFX (0.79). CWGFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. VPRDX (32.00). VPRDX has a lower initial minimum investment than CWGFX: VPRDX (0) vs CWGFX (250). CWGFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.85 vs. VPRDX (-40.28). CWGFX return over 5 years is better than : 31.88 vs. VPRDX (-47.19).
| CWGFX | VPRDX | CWGFX / VPRDX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.79 | 0.89 | 89% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.79 | 0.89 | 89% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.611 | -10.354 | -131% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 160B | 65.2M | 245,399% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.30 | 0.69 | 187% |
| Returns for 1 year | 17.85 | -40.28 | -44% |
| Returns for 3 years | 48.83 | -37.38 | -131% |
| Returns for 5 years | 31.88 | -47.19 | -68% |
| Returns for 10 years | 101.83 | -33.46 | -304% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers