Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CWGFX vs VTWAX
CWGFX vs VTWAX Comparison
Open Charts CWGFX vs VTWAX
CWGFX vs VTWAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CWGFX vs. VTWAX commentary
Jun 18, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CWGFX is a Hold and VTWAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CWGFX has more cash in the bank: 160B vs. VTWAX (95.3B). VTWAX pays higher dividends than CWGFX: VTWAX (1.57) vs CWGFX (1.30). CWGFX was incepted earlier than VTWAX: CWGFX (25 years) vs VTWAX (7 years). CWGFX (0.79) is less costly to investors than VTWAX (0.09). CWGFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. VTWAX (3.00). CWGFX has a lower initial minimum investment than VTWAX: CWGFX (250) vs VTWAX (3000). VTWAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 26.79 vs. CWGFX (21.14). VTWAX return over 5 years is better than : 57.79 vs. CWGFX (36.42).
| CWGFX | VTWAX | CWGFX / VTWAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.79 | 0.09 | 878% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.79 | 0.09 | 878% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.370 | 11.956 | 129% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 3000 | 8% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 160B | 95.3B | 168% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.30 | 1.57 | 83% |
| Returns for 1 year | 21.14 | 26.79 | 79% |
| Returns for 3 years | 49.47 | 63.95 | 77% |
| Returns for 5 years | 36.42 | 57.79 | 63% |
| Returns for 10 years | 104.81 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement