Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CWIAX vs LGCFX
CWIAX vs LGCFX Comparison
Open Charts CWIAX vs LGCFX
CWIAX vs LGCFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CWIAX vs. LGCFX commentary
Aug 09, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CWIAX is a Buy and LGCFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CWIAX has more cash in the bank: 158B vs. LGCFX (404M). CWIAX pays higher dividends than LGCFX: CWIAX (1.35) vs LGCFX (0.38). CWIAX was incepted earlier than LGCFX: CWIAX (24 years) vs LGCFX (10 years). LGCFX (0.89) is less costly to investors than CWIAX (0.75). LGCFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 61.00 vs. CWIAX (44.00). LGCFX has a lower initial minimum investment than CWIAX: LGCFX (0) vs CWIAX (250). CWIAX (17.96) and LGCFX (17.92) have marching annual gain over last year. LGCFX return over 5 years is better than : 42.95 vs. CWIAX (38.32).
| CWIAX | LGCFX | CWIAX / LGCFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.75 | 0.75 | 100% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.75 | 0.89 | 84% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 17.112 | 12.246 | 140% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 158B | 404M | 39,109% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.35 | 0.38 | 354% |
| Returns for 1 year | 17.96 | 17.92 | 100% |
| Returns for 3 years | 50.47 | 72.32 | 70% |
| Returns for 5 years | 38.32 | 42.95 | 89% |
| Returns for 10 years | 117.25 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement