Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CWIAX vs LGCFX
CWIAX vs LGCFX Comparison
Open Charts CWIAX vs LGCFX
CWIAX vs LGCFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CWIAX vs. LGCFX commentary
Jun 19, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CWIAX is a Hold and LGCFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CWIAX has more cash in the bank: 160B vs. LGCFX (392M). CWIAX pays higher dividends than LGCFX: CWIAX (1.33) vs LGCFX (0.38). CWIAX was incepted earlier than LGCFX: CWIAX (24 years) vs LGCFX (9 years). LGCFX (0.89) is less costly to investors than CWIAX (0.75). LGCFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 61.00 vs. CWIAX (44.00). LGCFX has a lower initial minimum investment than CWIAX: LGCFX (0) vs CWIAX (250). CWIAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 20.26 vs. LGCFX (18.84). LGCFX return over 5 years is better than : 41.37 vs. CWIAX (38.29).
| CWIAX | LGCFX | CWIAX / LGCFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.75 | 0.75 | 100% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.75 | 0.89 | 84% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.536 | 7.189 | 202% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 160B | 392M | 40,816% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.33 | 0.38 | 352% |
| Returns for 1 year | 20.26 | 18.84 | 108% |
| Returns for 3 years | 48.50 | 68.20 | 71% |
| Returns for 5 years | 38.29 | 41.37 | 93% |
| Returns for 10 years | 125.31 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers