Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CWIAX vs MSFAX
CWIAX vs MSFAX Comparison
Open Charts CWIAX vs MSFAX
CWIAX vs MSFAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CWIAX vs. MSFAX commentary
Aug 26, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CWIAX is a StrongBuy and MSFAX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CWIAX has more cash in the bank: 156B vs. MSFAX (977M). CWIAX pays higher dividends than MSFAX: CWIAX (1.35) vs MSFAX (0.49). CWIAX was incepted earlier than MSFAX: CWIAX (25 years) vs MSFAX (25 years). MSFAX (0.96) is less costly to investors than CWIAX (0.75). CWIAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. MSFAX (35.00). CWIAX has a lower initial minimum investment than MSFAX: CWIAX (250) vs MSFAX (1000000). CWIAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.22 vs. MSFAX (-17.97). CWIAX return over 5 years is better than : 38.49 vs. MSFAX (-14.74).
| CWIAX | MSFAX | CWIAX / MSFAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.75 | 0.96 | 78% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.75 | 0.96 | 78% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 17.183 | -2.293 | -749% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 156B | 977M | 15,967% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.35 | 0.49 | 275% |
| Returns for 1 year | 16.22 | -17.97 | -90% |
| Returns for 3 years | 54.85 | -11.65 | -471% |
| Returns for 5 years | 38.49 | -14.74 | -261% |
| Returns for 10 years | 117.86 | 38.74 | 304% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement