Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CWIAX vs MSFAX
CWIAX vs MSFAX Comparison
Open Charts CWIAX vs MSFAX
CWIAX vs MSFAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CWIAX vs. MSFAX commentary
Jul 07, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CWIAX is a Buy and MSFAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CWIAX has more cash in the bank: 160B vs. MSFAX (1.04B). CWIAX pays higher dividends than MSFAX: CWIAX (1.34) vs MSFAX (0.52). CWIAX was incepted earlier than MSFAX: CWIAX (24 years) vs MSFAX (25 years). MSFAX (0.96) is less costly to investors than CWIAX (0.75). CWIAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. MSFAX (35.00). CWIAX has a lower initial minimum investment than MSFAX: CWIAX (250) vs MSFAX (1000000). CWIAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.11 vs. MSFAX (-24.63). CWIAX return over 5 years is better than : 36.90 vs. MSFAX (-19.64).
| CWIAX | MSFAX | CWIAX / MSFAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.75 | 0.96 | 78% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.75 | 0.96 | 78% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.357 | -8.331 | -184% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 160B | 1.04B | 15,444% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.34 | 0.52 | 259% |
| Returns for 1 year | 16.11 | -24.63 | -65% |
| Returns for 3 years | 52.33 | -16.06 | -326% |
| Returns for 5 years | 36.90 | -19.64 | -188% |
| Returns for 10 years | 122.92 | 30.40 | 404% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement