Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CWIAX vs MSGFX
CWIAX vs MSGFX Comparison
Open Charts CWIAX vs MSGFX
CWIAX vs MSGFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CWIAX vs. MSGFX commentary
Jul 26, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CWIAX is a Buy and MSGFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CWIAX has more cash in the bank: 158B vs. MSGFX (927M). CWIAX pays higher dividends than MSGFX: CWIAX (1.34) vs MSGFX (0.00). CWIAX was incepted earlier than MSGFX: CWIAX (24 years) vs MSGFX (11 years). MSGFX (1.95) is less costly to investors than CWIAX (0.75). CWIAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. MSGFX (35.00). CWIAX has a lower initial minimum investment than MSGFX: CWIAX (250) vs MSGFX (1000). CWIAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.78 vs. MSGFX (-27.49). CWIAX return over 5 years is better than : 32.95 vs. MSGFX (-27.84).
| CWIAX | MSGFX | CWIAX / MSGFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.75 | 1.95 | 38% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.75 | 1.95 | 38% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.413 | -11.630 | -107% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 158B | 927M | 17,044% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.34 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.78 | -27.49 | -43% |
| Returns for 3 years | 42.17 | -25.28 | -167% |
| Returns for 5 years | 32.95 | -27.84 | -118% |
| Returns for 10 years | 111.70 | 15.06 | 742% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement