Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CWIAX vs MSGQX
CWIAX vs MSGQX Comparison
Open Charts CWIAX vs MSGQX
CWIAX vs MSGQX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CWIAX vs. MSGQX commentary
Jun 16, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CWIAX is a Buy and MSGQX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CWIAX has more cash in the bank: 160B vs. MSGQX (21.6M). CWIAX pays higher dividends than MSGQX: CWIAX (1.33) vs MSGQX (0.00). CWIAX was incepted earlier than MSGQX: CWIAX (24 years) vs MSGQX (11 years). MSGQX (2.62) is less costly to investors than CWIAX (0.75). MSGQX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 49.00 vs. CWIAX (44.00). CWIAX has a lower initial minimum investment than MSGQX: CWIAX (250) vs MSGQX (1000). CWIAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 21.63 vs. MSGQX (-32.03). CWIAX return over 5 years is better than : 38.16 vs. MSGQX (-35.58).
| CWIAX | MSGQX | CWIAX / MSGQX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.75 | 1.90 | 39% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.75 | 2.62 | 29% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.008 | -5.675 | -282% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 160B | 21.6M | 740,741% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.33 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 21.63 | -32.03 | -68% |
| Returns for 3 years | 50.40 | -33.03 | -153% |
| Returns for 5 years | 38.16 | -35.58 | -107% |
| Returns for 10 years | 128.21 | -3.94 | -3,254% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement