Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CWICX vs FGILX
CWICX vs FGILX Comparison
Open Charts CWICX vs FGILX
CWICX vs FGILX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CWICX vs. FGILX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CWICX is a Hold and FGILX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CWICX has more cash in the bank: 160B vs. FGILX (473M). FGILX pays higher dividends than CWICX: FGILX (0.83) vs CWICX (0.69). CWICX was incepted earlier than FGILX: CWICX (24 years) vs FGILX (14 years). CWICX (1.52) is less costly to investors than FGILX (0.91). CWICX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. FGILX (19.00). FGILX has a lower initial minimum investment than CWICX: FGILX (0) vs CWICX (250). FGILX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 23.38 vs. CWICX (20.88). FGILX return over 5 years is better than : 52.36 vs. CWICX (32.81).
| CWICX | FGILX | CWICX / FGILX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.52 | 0.91 | 167% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.52 | 0.91 | 167% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.199 | 10.530 | 144% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 160B | 473M | 33,827% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.69 | 0.83 | 83% |
| Returns for 1 year | 20.88 | 23.38 | 89% |
| Returns for 3 years | 49.71 | 65.60 | 76% |
| Returns for 5 years | 32.81 | 52.36 | 63% |
| Returns for 10 years | 114.97 | 154.80 | 74% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement