Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CWICX vs LGCFX
CWICX vs LGCFX Comparison
Open Charts CWICX vs LGCFX
CWICX vs LGCFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CWICX vs. LGCFX commentary
Jul 17, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CWICX is a Hold and LGCFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CWICX has more cash in the bank: 158B vs. LGCFX (399M). CWICX pays higher dividends than LGCFX: CWICX (0.66) vs LGCFX (0.38). CWICX was incepted earlier than LGCFX: CWICX (24 years) vs LGCFX (9 years). CWICX (1.52) is less costly to investors than LGCFX (0.89). LGCFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 61.00 vs. CWICX (44.00). LGCFX has a lower initial minimum investment than CWICX: LGCFX (0) vs CWICX (250). LGCFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.64 vs. CWICX (14.88). LGCFX return over 5 years is better than : 41.31 vs. CWICX (31.88).
| CWICX | LGCFX | CWICX / LGCFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.52 | 0.75 | 203% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.52 | 0.89 | 171% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.899 | 8.032 | 173% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 158B | 399M | 39,599% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.66 | 0.38 | 172% |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.88 | 16.64 | 89% |
| Returns for 3 years | 42.24 | 64.86 | 65% |
| Returns for 5 years | 31.88 | 41.31 | 77% |
| Returns for 10 years | 99.62 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement