Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CWICX vs RGLAX
CWICX vs RGLAX Comparison
Open Charts CWICX vs RGLAX
CWICX vs RGLAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CWICX vs. RGLAX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CWICX is a Hold and RGLAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CWICX has more cash in the bank: 160B vs. RGLAX (21.5B). CWICX pays higher dividends than RGLAX: CWICX (0.69) vs RGLAX (0.26). CWICX was incepted earlier than RGLAX: CWICX (24 years) vs RGLAX (7 years). CWICX (1.52) and RGLAX (1.51) have similar cost to investors . CWICX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. RGLAX (35.00). CWICX (250) and RGLAX (250) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. RGLAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 23.51 vs. CWICX (20.88). RGLAX return over 5 years is better than : 51.22 vs. CWICX (32.81).
| CWICX | RGLAX | CWICX / RGLAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.52 | 1.51 | 101% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.52 | 1.51 | 101% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.199 | 10.127 | 150% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 250 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 160B | 21.5B | 744% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.69 | 0.26 | 270% |
| Returns for 1 year | 20.88 | 23.51 | 89% |
| Returns for 3 years | 49.71 | 57.14 | 87% |
| Returns for 5 years | 32.81 | 51.22 | 64% |
| Returns for 10 years | 114.97 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers