Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CWICX vs RGLBX
CWICX vs RGLBX Comparison
Open Charts CWICX vs RGLBX
CWICX vs RGLBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CWICX vs. RGLBX commentary
Aug 03, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CWICX is a Buy and RGLBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CWICX has more cash in the bank: 158B vs. RGLBX (21.6B). CWICX pays higher dividends than RGLBX: CWICX (0.66) vs RGLBX (0.30). CWICX was incepted earlier than RGLBX: CWICX (24 years) vs RGLBX (7 years). RGLBX (1.53) and CWICX (1.52) have similar cost to investors . CWICX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. RGLBX (35.00). CWICX (250) and RGLBX (250) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. RGLBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.03 vs. CWICX (14.67). RGLBX return over 5 years is better than : 47.50 vs. CWICX (30.63).
| CWICX | RGLBX | CWICX / RGLBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.52 | 1.53 | 99% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.52 | 1.53 | 99% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.489 | 9.517 | 142% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 250 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 158B | 21.6B | 731% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.66 | 0.30 | 222% |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.67 | 18.03 | 81% |
| Returns for 3 years | 40.76 | 50.92 | 80% |
| Returns for 5 years | 30.63 | 47.50 | 64% |
| Returns for 10 years | 98.86 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers