Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CWICX vs RGLDX
CWICX vs RGLDX Comparison
Open Charts CWICX vs RGLDX
CWICX vs RGLDX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CWICX vs. RGLDX commentary
Jun 15, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CWICX is a Buy and RGLDX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CWICX has more cash in the bank: 160B vs. RGLDX (21.5B). CWICX pays higher dividends than RGLDX: CWICX (0.69) vs RGLDX (0.51). CWICX was incepted earlier than RGLDX: CWICX (24 years) vs RGLDX (7 years). CWICX (1.52) is less costly to investors than RGLDX (1.17). CWICX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. RGLDX (35.00). CWICX (250) and RGLDX (250) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. RGLDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.67 vs. CWICX (16.96). RGLDX return over 5 years is better than : 47.63 vs. CWICX (29.59).
| CWICX | RGLDX | CWICX / RGLDX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.52 | 1.10 | 138% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.52 | 1.17 | 130% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.238 | 7.899 | 168% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 250 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 160B | 21.5B | 744% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.69 | 0.51 | 137% |
| Returns for 1 year | 16.96 | 18.67 | 91% |
| Returns for 3 years | 45.52 | 54.06 | 84% |
| Returns for 5 years | 29.59 | 47.63 | 62% |
| Returns for 10 years | 108.86 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers