Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CWICX vs RGLEX
CWICX vs RGLEX Comparison
Open Charts CWICX vs RGLEX
CWICX vs RGLEX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CWICX vs. RGLEX commentary
Jun 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CWICX is a Buy and RGLEX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CWICX has more cash in the bank: 152B vs. RGLEX (20.6B). RGLEX pays higher dividends than CWICX: RGLEX (0.80) vs CWICX (0.69). CWICX was incepted earlier than RGLEX: CWICX (24 years) vs RGLEX (7 years). CWICX (1.52) is less costly to investors than RGLEX (0.80). CWICX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. RGLEX (35.00). CWICX (250) and RGLEX (250) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. RGLEX (22.10) and CWICX (21.49) have marching annual gain over last year. RGLEX return over 5 years is better than : 53.54 vs. CWICX (32.95).
| CWICX | RGLEX | CWICX / RGLEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.52 | 0.80 | 190% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.52 | 0.80 | 190% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.268 | 9.512 | 161% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 250 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 152B | 20.6B | 738% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.69 | 0.80 | 86% |
| Returns for 1 year | 21.49 | 22.10 | 97% |
| Returns for 3 years | 51.09 | 59.19 | 86% |
| Returns for 5 years | 32.95 | 53.54 | 62% |
| Returns for 10 years | 106.26 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement