Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CWICX vs RGLFX
CWICX vs RGLFX Comparison
Open Charts CWICX vs RGLFX
CWICX vs RGLFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CWICX vs. RGLFX commentary
Jun 15, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CWICX is a Buy and RGLFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CWICX has more cash in the bank: 160B vs. RGLFX (21.5B). RGLFX pays higher dividends than CWICX: RGLFX (1.04) vs CWICX (0.69). CWICX was incepted earlier than RGLFX: CWICX (24 years) vs RGLFX (7 years). CWICX (1.52) is less costly to investors than RGLFX (0.51). CWICX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. RGLFX (35.00). CWICX (250) and RGLFX (250) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. RGLFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 19.31 vs. CWICX (16.96). RGLFX return over 5 years is better than : 51.98 vs. CWICX (29.59).
| CWICX | RGLFX | CWICX / RGLFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.52 | 0.51 | 298% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.52 | 0.51 | 298% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.238 | 8.178 | 162% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 250 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 160B | 21.5B | 744% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.69 | 1.04 | 66% |
| Returns for 1 year | 16.96 | 19.31 | 88% |
| Returns for 3 years | 45.52 | 56.67 | 80% |
| Returns for 5 years | 29.59 | 51.98 | 57% |
| Returns for 10 years | 108.86 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers