Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CWICX vs RGLFX
CWICX vs RGLFX Comparison
Open Charts CWICX vs RGLFX
CWICX vs RGLFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CWICX vs. RGLFX commentary
Sep 15, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CWICX is a Buy and RGLFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CWICX has more cash in the bank: 158B vs. RGLFX (21.7B). RGLFX pays higher dividends than CWICX: RGLFX (1.03) vs CWICX (0.65). CWICX was incepted earlier than RGLFX: CWICX (25 years) vs RGLFX (7 years). CWICX (1.52) is less costly to investors than RGLFX (0.51). CWICX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. RGLFX (35.00). CWICX (250) and RGLFX (250) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. RGLFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.50 vs. CWICX (9.51). RGLFX return over 5 years is better than : 51.82 vs. CWICX (28.51).
| CWICX | RGLFX | CWICX / RGLFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.52 | 0.51 | 298% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.52 | 0.51 | 298% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.026 | 9.165 | 153% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 250 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 158B | 21.7B | 728% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.65 | 1.03 | 63% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.51 | 13.50 | 70% |
| Returns for 3 years | 46.02 | 59.19 | 78% |
| Returns for 5 years | 28.51 | 51.82 | 55% |
| Returns for 10 years | 99.69 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement