Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CWICX vs RGLGX
CWICX vs RGLGX Comparison
Open Charts CWICX vs RGLGX
CWICX vs RGLGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CWICX vs. RGLGX commentary
Jul 06, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CWICX is a Buy and RGLGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CWICX has more cash in the bank: 160B vs. RGLGX (21.5B). RGLGX pays higher dividends than CWICX: RGLGX (1.06) vs CWICX (0.66). CWICX was incepted earlier than RGLGX: CWICX (24 years) vs RGLGX (7 years). CWICX (1.52) is less costly to investors than RGLGX (0.45). CWICX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. RGLGX (35.00). CWICX (250) and RGLGX (250) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. RGLGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 19.82 vs. CWICX (14.79). RGLGX return over 5 years is better than : 55.60 vs. CWICX (30.00).
| CWICX | RGLGX | CWICX / RGLGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.52 | 0.45 | 338% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.52 | 0.45 | 338% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.758 | 10.395 | 132% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 250 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 160B | 21.5B | 744% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.66 | 1.06 | 62% |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.79 | 19.82 | 75% |
| Returns for 3 years | 44.86 | 58.43 | 77% |
| Returns for 5 years | 30.00 | 55.60 | 54% |
| Returns for 10 years | 104.70 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement