Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CWICX vs RGLGX
CWICX vs RGLGX Comparison
Open Charts CWICX vs RGLGX
CWICX vs RGLGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CWICX vs. RGLGX commentary
Jun 16, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CWICX is a Buy and RGLGX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CWICX has more cash in the bank: 160B vs. RGLGX (21.5B). RGLGX pays higher dividends than CWICX: RGLGX (1.08) vs CWICX (0.69). CWICX was incepted earlier than RGLGX: CWICX (24 years) vs RGLGX (7 years). CWICX (1.52) is less costly to investors than RGLGX (0.45). CWICX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. RGLGX (35.00). CWICX (250) and RGLGX (250) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. RGLGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 22.89 vs. CWICX (20.66). RGLGX return over 5 years is better than : 55.52 vs. CWICX (32.92).
| CWICX | RGLGX | CWICX / RGLGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.52 | 0.45 | 338% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.52 | 0.45 | 338% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.580 | 9.972 | 156% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 250 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 160B | 21.5B | 744% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.69 | 1.08 | 64% |
| Returns for 1 year | 20.66 | 22.89 | 90% |
| Returns for 3 years | 46.95 | 57.75 | 81% |
| Returns for 5 years | 32.92 | 55.52 | 59% |
| Returns for 10 years | 111.39 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement