Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CWICX vs RGLHX
CWICX vs RGLHX Comparison
Open Charts CWICX vs RGLHX
CWICX vs RGLHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CWICX vs. RGLHX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CWICX is a Buy and RGLHX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CWICX has more cash in the bank: 158B vs. RGLHX (21.7B). CWICX pays higher dividends than RGLHX: CWICX (0.65) vs RGLHX (0.47). CWICX was incepted earlier than RGLHX: CWICX (25 years) vs RGLHX (7 years). CWICX (1.52) is less costly to investors than RGLHX (1.24). CWICX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. RGLHX (35.00). CWICX (250) and RGLHX (250) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. RGLHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.60 vs. CWICX (10.61). RGLHX return over 5 years is better than : 48.45 vs. CWICX (30.33).
| CWICX | RGLHX | CWICX / RGLHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.52 | 1.24 | 123% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.52 | 1.24 | 123% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.368 | 9.619 | 160% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 250 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 158B | 21.7B | 728% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.65 | 0.47 | 137% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.61 | 13.60 | 78% |
| Returns for 3 years | 48.18 | 57.40 | 84% |
| Returns for 5 years | 30.33 | 48.45 | 63% |
| Returns for 10 years | 102.33 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers