Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CWICX vs RGLHX
CWICX vs RGLHX Comparison
Open Charts CWICX vs RGLHX
CWICX vs RGLHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CWICX vs. RGLHX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CWICX is a Hold and RGLHX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CWICX has more cash in the bank: 160B vs. RGLHX (21.5B). CWICX pays higher dividends than RGLHX: CWICX (0.69) vs RGLHX (0.48). CWICX was incepted earlier than RGLHX: CWICX (24 years) vs RGLHX (7 years). CWICX (1.52) is less costly to investors than RGLHX (1.24). CWICX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. RGLHX (35.00). CWICX (250) and RGLHX (250) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. RGLHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 23.80 vs. CWICX (20.88). RGLHX return over 5 years is better than : 52.22 vs. CWICX (32.81).
| CWICX | RGLHX | CWICX / RGLHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.52 | 1.24 | 123% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.52 | 1.24 | 123% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.199 | 10.218 | 149% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 250 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 160B | 21.5B | 744% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.69 | 0.48 | 144% |
| Returns for 1 year | 20.88 | 23.80 | 88% |
| Returns for 3 years | 49.71 | 58.26 | 85% |
| Returns for 5 years | 32.81 | 52.22 | 63% |
| Returns for 10 years | 114.97 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement