Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CWICX vs RGLJX
CWICX vs RGLJX Comparison
Open Charts CWICX vs RGLJX
CWICX vs RGLJX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CWICX vs. RGLJX commentary
Jun 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CWICX is a Buy and RGLJX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CWICX has more cash in the bank: 152B vs. RGLJX (20.6B). RGLJX pays higher dividends than CWICX: RGLJX (0.97) vs CWICX (0.69). CWICX was incepted earlier than RGLJX: CWICX (24 years) vs RGLJX (7 years). CWICX (1.52) is less costly to investors than RGLJX (0.71). CWICX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. RGLJX (35.00). CWICX (250) and RGLJX (250) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. RGLJX (22.31) and CWICX (21.49) have marching annual gain over last year. RGLJX return over 5 years is better than : 54.98 vs. CWICX (32.95).
| CWICX | RGLJX | CWICX / RGLJX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.52 | 0.60 | 253% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.52 | 0.71 | 214% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.268 | 9.601 | 159% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 250 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 152B | 20.6B | 738% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.69 | 0.97 | 71% |
| Returns for 1 year | 21.49 | 22.31 | 96% |
| Returns for 3 years | 51.09 | 60.20 | 85% |
| Returns for 5 years | 32.95 | 54.98 | 60% |
| Returns for 10 years | 106.26 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement