Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CWICX vs RGLJX
CWICX vs RGLJX Comparison
Open Charts CWICX vs RGLJX
CWICX vs RGLJX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CWICX vs. RGLJX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CWICX is a Hold and RGLJX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CWICX has more cash in the bank: 160B vs. RGLJX (21.5B). RGLJX pays higher dividends than CWICX: RGLJX (0.97) vs CWICX (0.69). CWICX was incepted earlier than RGLJX: CWICX (24 years) vs RGLJX (7 years). CWICX (1.52) is less costly to investors than RGLJX (0.71). CWICX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. RGLJX (35.00). CWICX (250) and RGLJX (250) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. RGLJX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 24.54 vs. CWICX (20.88). RGLJX return over 5 years is better than : 56.55 vs. CWICX (32.81).
| CWICX | RGLJX | CWICX / RGLJX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.52 | 0.60 | 253% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.52 | 0.71 | 214% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.199 | 10.554 | 144% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 250 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 160B | 21.5B | 744% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.69 | 0.97 | 71% |
| Returns for 1 year | 20.88 | 24.54 | 85% |
| Returns for 3 years | 49.71 | 61.03 | 81% |
| Returns for 5 years | 32.81 | 56.55 | 58% |
| Returns for 10 years | 114.97 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement